- Published by Ashley Kasarjian, an attorney at Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P. in Phoenix, Arizona
Topics
-
Recent Posts
- The Arizona Breakdown – EEOC Charges, Sunny Days, and a Few Things In Between
- Employment and the Law Goes on Vacation! (Sort of)
- EEOC Issues Informal Discussion Letter Regarding the Requirement that Job Applicants Graduate High School
- The 2011 EEOC Performance and Accountability Report
- It’s National Pro Bono Celebration Week!
- The Social Media Trifecta – The SHRM, Nielsen and NLRB Reports – Part Three
- The Social Media Trifecta – The SHRM, Nielsen and NLRB Reports – Part Two
- The Social Media Trifecta – The SHRM, Nielsen and NLRB Reports – Part One
- Employment and the Law Named Top Labor and Employment Law Blog for 2011 by LexisNexis
- The American Jobs Act – Prohibition on Discrimination Against the Unemployed
Twitter Updates
S&W – News and Events- Corporate Board Member Magazine Names Snell & Wilmer Top Corporate Law Firm in Phoenix for Twelfth Consecutive Year May 21, 2012
- Snell & Wilmer Selected as Community Partner of the Year May 17, 2012
- Daily Journal Names Snell & Wilmer Attorney to Top Women Lawyers List May 16, 2012
- Snell & Wilmer Team to Present Throughout ERAI Executive Conference May 11, 2012
- Betting on i-Gaming could have big returns May 16, 2012
Local & Legal Websites
Category Archives: WARN
More on Voluntary Departures under WARN: The Ninth Circuit Weighs In
In a case of first impression, the Ninth Circuit held that if an employee leaves a job because the business is closing, that employee has not “voluntarily departed” within the meaning of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act (“WARN”). In … Continue reading
Posted in Arizona, DOL, WARN
Tagged Arizona, Collins v. Gee West Seattle, layoffs, Ninth Circuit, WARN, Worker Adjustment Retraining Act
Leave a comment
Should I Stay or Should I Go: The Seventh Circuit Explores Voluntary Departures under the WARN Act
In Ellis v. DHL Express, Inc., the Seventh Circuit affirmed the decision of the Northern District of Illinois and held that the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act was not implicated as a result of the layoffs of employees by package … Continue reading

